I was doing some testing on setting meta data to geopoints, and the following happened, and I am not sure if it supposed to happen.
Step 1. Set meta data to a geopoint having a User relation with variable name user, pointing to the user I selected.
Step 2. I noticed that the User’s table was updated to have that relation as so: Geopoint.user (child of) which was expected.
Step 3. I deleted the geopoint.
Step 4. I went back to User’s table and the relation Geopint.user (child of) is still there.
Is that behavior expected? and if yes, what the purpose?
Regards,
George